AI Opportunity Map
A ranked set of candidate AI applications based on health value, feasibility, implementation burden, and risk.
AI Health Opportunity Sprint
A 2–3 week decision sprint for health institutions that need to determine where AI can create meaningful value, what operating model would make it work, and what should happen next.
Given the health outcome we are responsible for, where — if anywhere — can AI materially improve the system, and what is the smallest credible next investment?
This is designed for institutions with a real health problem or mandate. It is not designed for generic AI education, personal health advice, or software shopping.
Define the outcome, population, pathway, actors, data, constraints, and failure points.
Identify candidate AI interventions and test them against value, feasibility, safety, workflow fit, adoption, and institutional reality.
Rank the opportunities, define the recommended operating model, specify the smallest credible experiment, and produce the Executive Decision Dossier.
This is a typical sequence. Some Sprints complete in two weeks.
A ranked set of candidate AI applications based on health value, feasibility, implementation burden, and risk.
A concrete view of how the proposed future works for the first real person the system must serve.
What AI does, what people do, where judgment resides, and how responsibility moves through the pathway.
Data, governance, clinical, operational, ethical, trust, and adoption constraints that must be resolved.
The smallest credible real-world test capable of generating useful evidence.
A clear recommendation to build, buy, partner, test, redesign, defer, or stop — and the reasoning leadership can defend.
Most AI strategy begins with the technology.
We begin with the health outcome.
We work backward through the real system — people, workflows, handoffs, data, trust, governance, safeguards, and incentives — before determining the appropriate role for AI.
The goal is not to produce more ideas. The goal is to make a better institutional decision.
If the answer is “do not proceed,” the Sprint has done its job.
If there is a credible opportunity, System Enablers can continue into:
The first engagement does not obligate the institution to continue.
Complex multi-country or multi-system work is scoped separately.